3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Eccon Construction Co. v. Lucas.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eccon Construction Co. v. Lucas Anchor | green | “question of causation raised by 'conflicting expert medical opinions' is one of fact.” | 6 |
| 2 | McPeek v. P. W. & W. Coal Co. | green | “finding upon conflicting medical evidence that a certain condition does or does not exist is . . . a conclusive finding of fact.” | 5 |
| 3 | Stancill v. Ford Motor Co. | green | “the deference that we give to the commission's fact finding on medical questions is based upon the 'unwisdom of an attempt by . . . courts uninitiated into the mysteries of the medical science debate to choose between conflicting expert medical opinions.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.