2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alabama v. North Carolina.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alabama v. North Carolina Anchor | green | “we do not-we cannot-add provisions to a federal statute.” | 7 |
| 2 | Midwest Foster Care & Adoption Ass'n v. Kincade | green | “finding an enforceable right solely within a purely definitional section is antithetical to requiring unambiguous congressional intent.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.