5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City & County of Denver v. District Court of the Second Judicial District.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City & County of Denver v. District Court of the Second Judicial District Anchor | green | “the jurisdiction of the court over any child adjudicated as neglected or dependent shall continue until he becomes twenty-one years of age unless earlier terminated by court order.” | 3 |
| 2 | K.D. v. People | green | “serve an important role in preserving the parent-child relationship.” | 3 |
| 3 | People ex rel. M.S. | green | “when the proposed disposition is termination of the parent-child legal relationship, the termination hearing serves as the dispositional hearing.” | 3 |
| 4 | A.M. v. A.C. | green | “parental relinquishment and adoption of children are important and necessary options to facilitate the permanent placement of minor children if the birth parents are unable or unwilling to provide proper parental care.” | 3 |
| 5 | In re B.D.G. | green | “are distinct in purpose, policy, and procedure” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.