Topic: direct evidence of the requisite intent is not required. · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #26589

3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hart v. State.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Hart v. State Anchor
texcrimapp · 2002
green “direct evidence of the requisite intent is not required.” 7
2 Trevino v. State
texapp · 2006
green “direct evidence of the requisite intent is not required.” 5
3 Edwards v. State
texapp · 2016
green “direct evidence of the requisite intent is not required.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check