4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from PROTECTION & ADVOCACY SYSTEM v. City of Albuquerque.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PROTECTION & ADVOCACY SYSTEM v. City of Albuquerque Anchor | green | “whether a party has standing to bring a claim is a question of law which we review de novo.” | 6 |
| 2 | Collins on Behalf of Collins v. Tabet | green | “a guardian ad litem would be absolutely immune in exercising functions such as testifying in court . . . and making reports and recommendations to the court in which the guardian acts as an actual functionary or arm of the court, not only in status or denomination but in reality.” | 3 |
| 3 | Phillips v. Allstate Insurance | green | “nothing more than a thinly disguised attempt by father to use the disciplinary system as an alternative forum in which to pursue his vendetta against the gal.” | 3 |
| 4 | Jaramillo v. Heaton | green | “rule 1-017 permits a parent to bring a cause of action on behalf of a minor child.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.