3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gutierrez v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gutierrez v. State Anchor | green | “the validity of a consensual search is a question of fact, and the state bears the burden to prove by clear and convincing evidence that consent was obtained voluntarily.” | 8 |
| 2 | Rogers v. State | green | “this list of factors is not exhaustive, however, and none is dispositive of a particular assertion of privacy; rather, we examine the circumstances surrounding the search in their totality.” | 4 |
| 3 | BRACKENS v. State | green | “there is no evidence demonstrating that appellant took any precautions (such as encryption) to protect his privacy in the information contained on the computer system” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.