6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 114 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Price.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Price Anchor | green | “the views of a subsequent congress form a hazardous basis for inferring the intent of an earlier one.” | 87 |
| 2 | United States v. Jersey Shore State Bank | green | “demonstrably at odds with the intentions of the drafters,” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Price | green | “the views of a subsequent legislature form a hazardous basis for inferring the intent of an earlier one.” | 3 |
| 4 | Hull Company v. Hauser's Foods | green | “the marketing of perishable agricultural commodities more orderly and efficient.” | 3 |
| 5 | West v. Sullivan | green | “whether the agency's answer is based on a permissible construction of the statute.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.