4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Kirk Tang Yuk.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Kirk Tang Yuk Anchor | green | “must show that: (1) the government, either willfully or inadvertently, suppressed evidence; (2) the evidence at issue is favorable to the defendant; and (3) the failure to disclose this evidence resulted in prejudice.” | 5 |
| 2 | Williams v. Artus | green | “is a firmly established, independent, and adequate state ground that bars habeas review of the merits of a constitutional claim.” | 4 |
| 3 | Charles v. Fischer | green | “reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” | 3 |
| 4 | Fore v. Ercole | green | “bears the burden of establishing both deficient performance and prejudice,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.