4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Awadelkariem v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Awadelkariem v. State Anchor | green | “when older precedent conflicts with a newer decision that is found to be more soundly reasoned, we may resolve the inconsistency in favor of the more soundly reasoned decision.” | 7 |
| 2 | LaFleur v. State | green | “form over substance to no discernible jurisprudential purpose.” | 3 |
| 3 | LaFleur v. State | green | “motor vehicle, a deadly weapon.” | 3 |
| 4 | Awadelkariem v. State | green | “conflicts with a newer decision that is found to be more soundly reasoned” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.