5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Muller v. Rogers.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Muller v. Rogers Anchor | green | “benefit of keeping a driver's license or obtaining handicapped license plates.” | 3 |
| 2 | State Ex Rel. Hayter v. Griffin | green | “records pertaining to a commercial driver's license medical examination are not within the scope of the physician-patient privilege” | 3 |
| 3 | Palm v. Holocker | green | “mere allegations are insufficient to place a party's mental or physical condition in "issue.” | 3 |
| 4 | Palm v. Holocker | green | “neither the nature of a plaintiff's cause of action nor factual allegations in a plaintiff's complaint waive a defendant's physician-patient privilege.” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Florendo | green | “the patient's physical or mental condition is an issue.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.