5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Estate of Stephens v. GALEN HEALTH CARE.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estate of Stephens v. GALEN HEALTH CARE Anchor | green | “information is disclosed, there is no remedy for the destruction of the privilege available on direct appeal.” | 3 |
| 2 | Bartow HMA, LLC v. Kirkland | green | “that is, where the trial court fails to specifically address whether claimed statutory privileges apply, leaving this court 'to guess at the basis for the discovery of each document' and as to whether the trial court even considered the objection, certiorari relief may be warran…” | 3 |
| 3 | Bartow HMA, LLC v. Kirkland | green | “this court 'to guess at the basis for the discovery of each document' and as to whether the trial court even considered the objection.” | 3 |
| 4 | Harborside HealthCare, LLC. v. Jacobson | green | “it also objected to various requests as subject to quality assurance, peer review, attorney-client, or work-product privileges; as proprietary documents; as violative of the privacy rights of the nursing facility's employees; and as violative of the health insurance portability …” | 3 |
| 5 | Harborside HealthCare, LLC. v. Jacobson | green | “requires production of documents-without explanation-despite objections that statutory protections apply.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.