5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from O'BANNER v. McDonald's Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O'BANNER v. McDonald's Corp. Anchor | green | “although use of the summary judgment procedure can be an efficient means for disposing of certain lawsuits, it is a drastic measure that should be employed only when the right of the moving party is clear and free from doubt.” | 3 |
| 2 | Zekman v. Direct American Marketers, Inc. | green | “(1) a deceptive act or practice by the defendant; (2) defendant's intent that plaintiff rely on the deception; and (3) the occurrence of the deception in the course of conduct involving trade or commerce.” | 3 |
| 3 | Zekman v. Direct American Marketers, Inc. | green | “and if there was a cash award on it.” | 3 |
| 4 | People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Stianos | green | “in determining whether a practice is unlawful as unfair or deceptive, consideration is to be given to the interpretations of the federal trade commission and the federal courts” | 3 |
| 5 | People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Stianos | green | “not capable of precise definition, and whether a given practice was unfair or deceptive must be determined on a case-by-case basis.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.