3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Carey v. Lovett.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carey v. Lovett Anchor | green | “absent a clear abuse of discretion, an appellate court will not interfere with the exercise of that discretion.” | 7 |
| 2 | Nicholas v. Mynster | green | “when a physician is a specialist and the basis of the malpractice action 'involves' the physician's specialty, the challenging expert must practice in the same specialty.” | 5 |
| 3 | Rachele Louise Castello v. Alexander M. Wohler, M.D. | green | “the patients first act establishes certain qualifications that expert witnesses in medical malpractice actions must possess.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.