3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLC Anchor | green | “a finding of unconscionability may be based on either procedural or substantive unconscionability, or a combination of both.” | 8 |
| 2 | Streams Sports Club, Ltd. v. Richmond | green | “mere disparity of bargaining power is not sufficient grounds to vitiate contractual obligations.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.