6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 114 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mary Valencia v. City of Springfield.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mary Valencia v. City of Springfield Anchor | green | “the court weighs the irreparable harm that the moving party would endure without the protection of the preliminary injunction against any irreparable harm the nonmoving party would suffer if the court were to grant the requested relief.” | 31 |
| 2 | Mary Valencia v. City of Springfield | green | “absent a preliminary injunction, it will suffer irreparable harm in the interim period prior to final resolution of its claims” | 28 |
| 3 | Mary Valencia v. City of Springfield | green | “to survive the threshold phase, a party seeking a preliminary injunction must satisfy three requirements.” | 26 |
| 4 | Foodcomm International v. Patrick James Barry | green | “rather, he must demonstrate that any award would be seriously deficient as compared to the harm suffered.” | 11 |
| 5 | Whitaker ex rel. Whitaker v. Kenosha Unified School District No. 1 Board of Education | green | “this does not require that he demonstrate that the remedy be wholly ineffectual.” | 11 |
| 6 | Proctor v. Sood | green | “such a substantial departure from accepted professional judgment, practice, or standards, as to demonstrate that they ... did not base the decisions on such a judgment.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.