5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Shelton v. the City of Chicago.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shelton v. the City of Chicago Anchor | green | “does not apply to express repeals of special statutory remedies.” | 3 |
| 2 | McCarthy v. Kunicki | green | “whether plaintiff ... used that degree of care which an ordinarily careful person would have used ... under like circumstances.” | 3 |
| 3 | Wills v. Foster | green | “from a source wholly independ- ent of, and collateral to, the tortfeasor.” | 3 |
| 4 | People Ex Rel. Eitel v. Lindheimer | green | “stops all pending actions where it finds them.” | 3 |
| 5 | Perry v. Department of Financial and Professional Regulation | green | “courts can apply retroactively statutory changes to procedural or remedial provisions.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.