3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Barbour v. Colvin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barbour v. Colvin Anchor | green | “this court has broad discretion in determining whether the amount of time expended by a plaintiff's counsel was reasonable.” | 7 |
| 2 | Binder & Binder, P.C. v. Colvin | green | “the social security act provides for successful representatives to be compensated for their services through deductions from payments that their clients are entitled to receive.” | 5 |
| 3 | Hogan v. Astrue | green | “courts in the second circuit have generally held that 'a routine social security case requires from twenty to forty hours of attorney time.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.