3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re NEB.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re NEB Anchor | green | “appellate courts must construe briefing requirements reasonably and liberally, but a party asserting error on appeal still must put forth some specific argument and analysis showing that the record and the law support his contention.” | 6 |
| 2 | Pedro Gonzalez & Maria Gomez v. Vatr Construction LLC & All American Roofing & Construction | green | “the failure to provide appropriate record citations or a substantive analysis waives an appellate issue.” | 5 |
| 3 | In Re NEB | green | “when a party fails to adequately brief a complaint, he waives the issue on appeal.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.