5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re TR.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re TR Anchor | green | “privacy claims must be balanced against state interests.” | 3 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Murray | green | “inherent and indefeasible rights” | 3 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Murray | green | “the right to privacy is as much property of the individual as the land to which he holds title and the clothing he wears on his back.” | 3 |
| 4 | Powell v. Philadelphia County District Attorney's Office | green | “portrays itself as a "quasi-judicial tribunal relative to the interests of public school employees, it must bear much of the responsibility for the procedural shortcomings in this area, as it has "settled on a construction of the rtkl which permits the disclosure of personal inf…” | 3 |
| 5 | Powell v. Philadelphia County District Attorney's Office | green | “in these unique circumstances, we have no difficulty in concluding that it is just and proper for the oor to be haled into court to address core and colorable issues connected with such treatment at the behest of affected persons and their associations.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.