5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 592 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from General Electric Co. v. Joiner.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | General Electric Co. v. Joiner Anchor | green | “a court may conclude that there is simply too great an analytical gap between the data and the opinion proffered.” | 180 |
| 2 | General Electric Co. v. Joiner | green | “nothing in either daubert or the federal rules of evidence requires a district court to admit opinion evidence that is connected to existing data only by the ipse dixit of the expert.” | 176 |
| 3 | General Electric Co. v. Joiner | green | “conclusions and methodology are not entirely distinct from one another.” | 91 |
| 4 | Knight v. Kirby Inland Marine Inc. | green | “the reliability analysis applies to all aspects of an expert's testimony: the methodology, the facts underlying the expert's opinion, the link between the facts and the conclusion, et alia.” | 78 |
| 5 | Paz v. Brush Engineered Materials, Inc. | green | “where the expert's opinion is based on insufficient information, the analysis is unreliable.” | 67 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.