5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Republic of Colombia v. DIAGEO NORTH AMERICA INC..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Republic of Colombia v. DIAGEO NORTH AMERICA INC. Anchor | green | “an interlocutory appeal is appropriate in this case because it is the most efficient means of advancing or disposing of the litigation” | 3 |
| 2 | Republic of Colombia v. DIAGEO NORTH AMERICA INC. | green | “exercise its discretion to permit an immediate appeal.” | 3 |
| 3 | Freeman v. HSBC Holdings PLC | green | “when asserting whether a plaintiff has plausibly alleged a shared co-conspiratorial purpose” | 3 |
| 4 | Freeman v. HSBC Holdings PLC | green | “would not significantly affect (much less terminate) the litiga- tion because new york's long-arm statute supplies an alternative basis for personal jurisdiction.” | 3 |
| 5 | Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization | green | “whether fuld v. palestine liberation org., 606 u.s. 1 (2025) ... overrules long-standing second circuit precedent requiring an assessment of the defendant's con- tacts with the united states.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.