2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Daniel Chernobieff.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Daniel Chernobieff Anchor | green | “when reviewing a case on petition for review from the court of appeals this court gives due consideration to the decision reached by the court of appeals, but directly reviews the decision of the trial court.” | 9 |
| 2 | Gilpin-Grubb v. State | green | “this court is not merely reviewing the correctness of the court of appeals' decision; rather, this court is hearing the matter as if the case were on direct appeal from the trial judge's decision.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.