5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Deseret News Publishing Co. v. Salt Lake County.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deseret News Publishing Co. v. Salt Lake County Anchor | green | “second, if the agency succeeds in showing that the privacy interest at stake is nontrivial, the requester 'must show that the public interest sought to be advanced is a significant one and that the information sought is likely to advance that interest.” | 3 |
| 2 | DR Partners v. Board of County Commissioners | green | “it is well settled that privileges, whether creatures of statute or the common law, should be interpreted and applied narrowly.” | 3 |
| 3 | Cameranesi v. United States Department of Defense | green | “second, if the agency succeeds in showing that the privacy interest at stake is nontrivial, the requester 'must show that the public interest sought to be advanced is a significant one and that the information sought is likely to advance that interest.” | 3 |
| 4 | Comstock Residents Ass'n v. Lyon Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs | green | “the best practices for local government record management and what constitutes a public record for purposes of the npra are distinct, and we are careful not to conflate them here.” | 3 |
| 5 | Reno Newspapers, Inc. v. Gibbons | green | “in the absence of a statutory provision that explicitly declares a record to be confidential, any limitations on disclosure must be based upon a broad balancing of the interests involved.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.