2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In the Matter of: L.Z., Appeal of: L.Z..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In the Matter of: L.Z., Appeal of: L.Z. Anchor | green | “as part of a dependency adjudication, a court may find a parent to be the perpetrator of child abuse,” | 10 |
| 2 | In the Int. of: T.G., Appeal of: Phila Dept.(DHS) | green | “as part of a dependency adjudication, a court may find a parent to be the perpetrator of child abuse,” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.