3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gail Herhold v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gail Herhold v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC Anchor | green | “a complaint should only be dismissed if it is clear to the court that no relief could be granted under any set of facts that could be proved consistent with the allegations.” | 5 |
| 2 | Ammex, Inc. v. Michigan Dep't of Agric. | green | “a claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” | 5 |
| 3 | Ammex, Inc. v. Michigan Dep't of Agric. | green | “view the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, accept all well-pleaded factual allegations as true, and look to see whether the complaint contains sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.