4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Brandão.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Brandão Anchor | green | “not every probation condition bearing a remote, attenuated, tangential, or diaphanous connection to future criminal conduct can be considered reasonable.” | 6 |
| 2 | People v. J.B. | green | “there is no reason to believe the current restriction will serve the rehabilitative function of precluding the defendant from any future criminal acts.” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Appleton | green | “probationer has the right to enjoy a significant degree of privacy, or liberty, under the fourth, fifth and fourteenth amendments to the federal constitution” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. J.E. | green | “had a constellation of issues requiring intensive supervision,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.