2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. Anchor | green | “f the person to whom the document request is made is a non-party, the court may also consider the expense and inconvenience to the non-party.” | 7 |
| 2 | Medical Center at Elizabeth Place, LLC v. Premier Health Partners | green | “the ourt is not convinced that the parties cannot evaluate the 7 marketplace without raiding secrets.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.