3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re E.B..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re E.B. Anchor | green | “parental rights, however, are not absolute, and a parent's natural rights are always subject to the ultimate welfare of the child.” | 6 |
| 2 | In re Schaefer | green | “greater relevance than the others.” | 6 |
| 3 | In Re Brofford | green | “in reviewing a judgment granting permanent custody to fccs, an appellate court 'must make every reasonable presumption in favor of the judgment and the trial court's findings of facts.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.