5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Forrest.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Forrest Anchor | green | “what you do have to do is evaluate who he was, because who he was is a measure of what you can look at.” | 3 |
| 2 | Simmons v. Superior Court of San Diego County | green | “even assuming the officers had probable cause to arrest the plaintiff, the complained-of conduct asserted here-multiple nonconsensual, roadside, physical body cavity searches-is necessarily intentional conduct that is separate and independent from a lawful arrest for being in a …” | 3 |
| 3 | Robert Reese, Jr. v. County of Sacramento | green | “properly pleaded and proved, the egregiousness required by section 52.1 is tested by whether the circumstances indicate the defendant had a specific intent to violate the plaintiff's civil rights, not by whether the evidence shows something beyond the coercion 'inherent' in the …” | 3 |
| 4 | Sabella v. Southern Pacific Co. | green | “each case must ultimately rest upon a court's view of the overall record, taking into account such factors, inter alia, as 19 the nature and seriousness of the remarks and misconduct, the general atmosphere, including the judge's control, of the trial, the likelihood of prejudic…” | 3 |
| 5 | Garcia v. Conmed Corp. | green | “must determine whether it is reasonably probable that the appellant would have achieved a more favorable result in the absence of that portion of attorney conduct now challenged.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.