3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of Philadelphia v. Cumberland County Board of Assessment Appeals.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of Philadelphia v. Cumberland County Board of Assessment Appeals Anchor | green | “the question of whether summary judgment is warranted is one of law, and thus our standard of review is de novo and our scope of review is plenary.” | 9 |
| 2 | City of Philadelphia v. Cumberland County Board of Assessment Appeals | green | “summary judgment may be entered only where the record demonstrates that there remain no genuine issues of material fact, and it is apparent that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 4 |
| 3 | JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Taggart, K., Aplt. | green | “act 6 requires a new pre-foreclosure notice each time the lender initiates a mortgage foreclosure action.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.