4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from C.G. v. J.H..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C.G. v. J.H. Anchor | green | “the best-interests standard, decided on a case-by-case basis, considers all factors which legitimately have an effect upon the child's physical, intellectual, moral and spiritual well-being.” | 6 |
| 2 | Collins v. Collins | green | “only if they involve an error of law, or are unreasonable in light of the sustainable findings of the trial court.” | 3 |
| 3 | Collins v. Collins | green | “whether the trial court's conclusions are unreasonable as shown by the evidence of record.” | 3 |
| 4 | R.L. v. M.A. | green | “delineate the reasons for its decision when making an award of custody either on the record or in a written opinion.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.