2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Book v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Book v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Anchor | green | “erely referencing" a constitutional provision "is not sufficient to confer subject matter jurisdiction.” | 6 |
| 2 | Wooten v. United States Department of Health & Human Services | green | “while plaintiff plainly disagrees with the outcome of the investigations, this does not make it a constitutional violation.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.