4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kriz v. Schum.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kriz v. Schum Anchor | green | “only one conclusion may be drawn from the established facts” | 5 |
| 2 | Kriz v. Schum | green | “where only one conclusion may be drawn from the established facts” | 4 |
| 3 | Jones v. Shamrock of Ithaca, Inc. | green | “has reason to expect or anticipate that a person's attention may be distracted, so that he or she will not discover what is obvious, or will forget what he or she has discovered, or fail to protect himself or herself against it” | 3 |
| 4 | Dillenbeck v. Shovelton | green | “defendant, as the movant for summary judgment, bore the initial burden of establishing, as a matter of law, that it maintained the property in a reasonably safe condition and did not have actual or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.