5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Miess v. Walkowiak.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miess v. Walkowiak Anchor | green | “moved under cplr 5227 for an order requiring the respondent to pay the amount of the judgment on the basis that the respondent was indebted to the judgment debtor in an amount exceeding the judgment” | 3 |
| 2 | Scholl v. Loy | green | “in which a party demands and sets forth facts which would permit a judgment for a sum of money only” | 3 |
| 3 | In re O'Connor | green | “harm likely to result from execution, against the necessity of using that immediate means of attempted satisfaction” | 3 |
| 4 | Arrow Communication Laboratories, Inc. v. Pico Products, Inc. | green | “depends upon the nature of the relief sought” | 3 |
| 5 | Arrow Communication Laboratories, Inc. v. Pico Products, Inc. | green | “if 'a sum of money alone can provide full relief to the plaintiff under the facts alleged, then there is a right to a jury trial” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.