5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kooper v. Kooper.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kooper v. Kooper Anchor | green | “entitlement to discovery of matter satisfying the threshold requirement is, however, tempered by the trial court's authority to impose, in its discretion, appropriate restrictions on demands which are unduly burdensome . . . and to prevent abuse by issuing a protective order whe…” | 3 |
| 2 | Kimball v. Normandeau | green | “entitlement to discovery of matter satisfying the threshold requirement is, however, tempered by the trial court's authority to impose, in its discretion, appropriate restrictions on demands which are unduly burdensome . . . and to prevent abuse by issuing a protective order whe…” | 3 |
| 3 | James v. Wormuth | green | “the requisite elements of proof in a medical malpractice action are a deviation or departure from accepted community standards of practice, and evidence that such deviation or departure was a proximate cause of injury or damage” | 3 |
| 4 | Alfaro v. Schwartz | green | “may be available in public records does not, in itself, preclude production” | 3 |
| 5 | Alfaro v. Schwartz | green | “the documents sought may be available in public records does not, in itself, preclude production of those records from a party” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.