3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Tillan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Tillan Anchor | green | “inasmuch as she did not demonstrate the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations for counsel's alleged shortcomings” | 6 |
| 2 | People v. Tillan | green | “demonstrate the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations for counsel's alleged shortcomings” | 5 |
| 3 | In re Burke H. | green | “address or gain insight into the problems that led to the removal of the child and continued to prevent the child's safe return” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.