3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Isaac v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Isaac v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services Anchor | green | “it was appropriate for the special master to consider the medical literature presented, including the iom report” | 6 |
| 2 | Althen v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human Services | green | “due to the iom's statutory charge, the scope of its review, and the cross-section of experts making up the committee reviewing the adverse events associated with vaccines, the court considers their determinations authoritative and subject to great deference.” | 5 |
| 3 | Isaac v. Secretary of Health & Human Services | green | “it was appropriate for the special master to consider the medical literature presented, including the iom report” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.