3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Altman v. J.C. Christensen & Associates, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Altman v. J.C. Christensen & Associates, Inc. Anchor | green | “the astuteness of a 'philadelphia lawyer' or even the sophistication of the average, everyday, common consumer,” | 5 |
| 2 | Avila v. Riexinger & Associates, LLC | green | “the second principle is that, in considering whether a collection notice violates section 1692e, courts in this circuit apply the 'least sophisticated consumer' standard.” | 5 |
| 3 | Arias v. Gutman, Mintz, Baker & Sonnenfeldt LLP | green | “congress enacted the fdcpa to 'eliminate abusive debt collection practices by debt collectors, to insure that those debt collectors who refrain from using abusive debt collection practices are not competitively disadvantaged, and to promote consistent state action to protect con…” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.