3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tillis v. Wright.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tillis v. Wright Anchor | green | “pecific statutory language generally takes precedence over more general statutory provisions.” | 4 |
| 2 | Bowers v. Wurzburg | green | “typically, when two statutes govern a particular scenario, one being specific and one being general, the specific provision prevails.” | 3 |
| 3 | Tillis v. Wright | green | “specific statutory language generally takes precedence over more general statutory provisions.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.