3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc. Anchor | green | “the well-settled rule of statutory construction that all parts of a statute, if at all possible, are to be given effect.” | 6 |
| 2 | Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc. | green | “all parts of a statute, if at all possible, are to be given effect.” | 5 |
| 3 | Alcala v. Holder | green | “moved to dismiss the removal proceedings it had commenced in december 2000 so that it might reinstate alcala's prior march 18, 2000 expedited removal order.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.