9 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 112 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Estate of Apple Ex Rel. Apple v. Commercial Courier Express, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estate of Apple Ex Rel. Apple v. Commercial Courier Express, Inc. Anchor | green | “if a party does not have standing to bring a claim, a court has no subject matter jurisdiction to hear the claim.” | 38 |
| 2 | Aubin v. Susi | green | “standing is a necessary prerequisite to a court's proper exercise of subject matter jurisdiction.” | 25 |
| 3 | American Woodland Industries, Inc. v. Tolson | green | “standing refers to whether a party has a sufficient stake in an otherwise justiciable controversy such that he or she may properly seek adjudication of the matter.” | 14 |
| 4 | Fuller v. Easley | green | “standing concerns the trial court's subject matter jurisdiction and is therefore properly challenged by a rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss.” | 13 |
| 5 | Tart v. Walker | green | “a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not viewed in the same manner as a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” | 11 |
| 6 | Street v. Smart Corp. | green | “standing is a necessary prerequisite to a court's proper exercise of subject matter jurisdiction.” | 4 |
| 7 | Estate of Apple Ex Rel. Apple v. Commercial Courier Express, Inc. | green | “a court has no subject matter jurisdiction to hear the claim.” | 1 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.