3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen Anchor | green | “persons challenging an agency's compliance with nepa must 'structure their participation so that it ... alerts the agency to the parties' position and contentions,' in order to allow the agency to give the issue meaningful consideration.” | 7 |
| 2 | Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. Bureau Of Land Management | green | “must be more than perfunctory; it must provide a useful analysis of the cumulative impacts of past, present, and future projects.” | 4 |
| 3 | Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. Bureau Of Land Management | green | “general statements about possible effects and some risk do not constitute a hard look absent a justification regarding why more definitive information could not be provided.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.