3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cole v. Ruidoso Municipal Schools.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cole v. Ruidoso Municipal Schools Anchor | green | “first, attorneys are bound by the local rules of the court in which they appear.” | 7 |
| 2 | ACCOUNTING PRINCIPALS, INC. v. Manpower, Inc. | green | “while attempting to avoid any inconsistencies with state law that would create procedural difficulties for practitioners in oklahoma.” | 4 |
| 3 | Weeks v. Independent School District No. I-89 | green | “it would arguably create difficulties for practitioners in oklahoma if federal courts were to adopt an interpretation of the orpc different from that adopted by the oklahoma supreme court.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.