4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Princess Cruises, Inc. v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Princess Cruises, Inc. v. United States Anchor | green | “the degree of connection between the operation of the new rule and a relevant past event” | 4 |
| 2 | Princess Cruises, Inc. v. United States | green | “familiar considerations of fair notice, reasonable reliance, and settled expectations.” | 3 |
| 3 | Christine Hix, Claimant-Appellee, and Mary L. Pardue, Claimant-Appellee v. Hershel W. Gober, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs | green | “de novo determination of the veteran's disability, upon the entirety of the record including any new evidence presented by the surviving spouse.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.