2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dialysis Access Center, LLC v. RMS Lifeline, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dialysis Access Center, LLC v. RMS Lifeline, Inc. Anchor | green | “whether or not a dispute is arbitrable is typically a question for judicial determination.” | 8 |
| 2 | Soto-Fonalledas v. Ritz-Carlton San Juan Hotel Spa & Casino | green | “a party who is seeking to compel arbitration must demonstrate that a valid agreement to arbitrate exists, that the movant is entitled to invoke the arbitration clause, that the other party is bound by that clause, and that the claim asserted comes within the clause's scope.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.