4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Weiss v. York Hospital.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Weiss v. York Hospital Anchor | green | “antitrust policy requires the courts to seek the economic substance of an arrangement, not merely its form.” | 5 |
| 2 | Arnold Pontiac-Gmc, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation | green | “we must infer that the dealers' conduct contributed to gmc's decision not to award the plaintiff the buick franchise.” | 3 |
| 3 | Farrell v. Triangle Publications, Inc. | green | “a number of township commissioners and others” | 3 |
| 4 | Farrell v. Triangle Publications, Inc. | green | “knew that the plaintiff was one of the thirteen commissioners.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.