3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Edgar E. Simpson v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Edgar E. Simpson v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services Anchor | green | “whether the commissioner's finding of improvement to the point of no disability is supported by substantial evidence.” | 6 |
| 2 | Betty J. McAULAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | green | “there can be no termination of benefits unless there is substantial evidence of improvement to the point of no disability.” | 5 |
| 3 | Dorothy M. VAUGHN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | green | “evaluate the medical evidence upon which the claimant was originally found to be disabled,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.