3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Massey v. District of Columbia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Massey v. District of Columbia Anchor | green | “a court has no subject matter jurisdiction over an idea claim that has not first been pursued through administrative channels.” | 7 |
| 2 | Anika Cox v. Dr. Andrew Jenkins | green | “the controlling point of law here is that, absent a showing that exhaustion would be futile or inadequate, a party must pursue all administrative avenues of redress under the idea before seeking judicial review under the act.” | 4 |
| 3 | Anika Cox v. Dr. Andrew Jenkins | green | “absent a showing that exhaustion would be futile or inadequate, a party must pursue all administrative avenues of redress under the idea before seeking judicial review under the act.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.