3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Norcal/Crosetti Foods, Inc. v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Norcal/Crosetti Foods, Inc. v. United States Anchor | green | “take jurisdiction over designated causes of action founded on other provisions of law.” | 7 |
| 2 | Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLC | green | “a party may not expand a court's jurisdiction by creative pleading.” | 4 |
| 3 | Intercontinental Chems., LLC v. United States | green | “bears the burden of demonstrating manifest inadequacy.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.