4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Parents of Student W, Individually and as Guardians Student W, a Minor v. Puyallup School District, No. 3.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parents of Student W, Individually and as Guardians Student W, a Minor v. Puyallup School District, No. 3 Anchor | green | “shall grant such relief as the court determines appropriate” | 4 |
| 2 | Parents of Student W, Individually and as Guardians Student W, a Minor v. Puyallup School District, No. 3 | green | “there is no obligation to provide a day-for-day compensation for time missed.” | 4 |
| 3 | Kletzelman v. Capistrano Unified School District | green | “where the plaintiff's success on a legal claim can be characterized as purely technical or de minimis.” | 4 |
| 4 | Kletzelman v. Capistrano Unified School District | green | “the touchstone of the prevailing party inquiry must be the material alteration of the legal relationship of the parties.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.